Why Home Users Absolutely Shouldn't Use Linux
All over the place, I'm seeing websites and blogs claiming that everybody needs to switch to Linux. Some say Ubuntu, some say Debian, and some say Slackware, but they all seem to agree on Linux in general. I have created a list of five reasons why they are wrong. Not all of these reasons will necessarily apply to you in particular, whoever you may be, but they all apply to somebody and enough apply to you.
1. You already PAID for an OS
Almost every new computer sold (with a few exceptions made by Dell) comes with either Mac OS X, Windows XP, or Windows Vista. When you purchased your computer, you PAID MONEY for the operating system that was bundled with it. Linux may be free, but why throw away what you already paid for? Furthermore, if you ever want to run Mac or Windows software on Linux, you have to PURCHASE MORE SOFTWARE to do so, rather than just running it natively on your pre-installed OS. It simply doesn't make economic sense, unless you are either a billionaire or bad at math. I'm pretty sure that I don't have any billionaire readers, so that means that ANYBODY WHO READS MY BLOG AND USES LINUX IS OPENLY ADMITTING TO HAVING FAILED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ARITHMETICS. You don't want to be known as a failure at elementary school, do you?
2. "Free alternatives" are just not as good
Because Linux won't actually run most commercial programs, many free programs have been made by Linux advocates as substitutes. Unfortunately, there are only three of these that are actually any good: Paint.net, OpenOffice.org, and Notepad ++, and two of the three don't even run on Linux! In addition, there is a lie being spread around that the GIMP is just as powerful as Photoshop and a good substitute; this may be true when comparing it to versions of Photoshop released in 1999 or earlier, but many of the most useful and important features introduced in Photoshop 6.0 and later still have yet to be replicated by the GIMP. This means that to accomplish anything useful in Linux other than word processing or spreadsheets, you have to use commercial, non-Linux software that won't necessarily even work when used with emulators or programs intended to do this, which very much defeats the purpose. TO DEFEAT SOMETHING AS KIND AND BEAUTIFUL AS THE PURPOSE IS VILLAINY, AND IF YOU DO THIS THAN KIM POSSIBLE WILL BUST INTO YOUR HOUSE AND BEAT THE CRAP OUT OF YOU. You don't want to be known as somebody who got beat up by a girl, do you?
3. It doesn't "just work"
When you buy a Mac, it comes pre-assembled with all compatible hardware and software. Most of it is made by the Apple and specifically designed to work well with what isn't made by Apple, so you can be sure it'll work right together. When you buy a PC, it comes pre-assembled with parts from all over the place that have been specifically selected by a manufacturer or retailer to make sure that they are compatible, so you can be sure it'll work right together. Linux, however, usually needs to be installed by the user, and there's no guarantee that a Linux driver will be available for whatever hardware you have. You'll likely spend long periods of time on community-based help sites such as ubuntuforums.org trying to solve a problem that would never have arisen on OSX or Windows. This means that ANYBODY WITH ANY AMOUNT OF EXPERIENCE WHO INSTALLS LINUX WILL TAKE LONGER INSTALLING A SIMPLE PRINTER THAN JOE AVERAGE WITH NEXT TO NO EXPERIENCE. You don't want to be known as slower than a noob, do you?
4. You are not a nerd
To install an application on a Mac, you drag the application's icon to where you want it to be, and you're done. To install an application on Windows, you run a step-by-step wizard that asks you where you want it to be, and sets up shortcuts for easy access. To install an application on Linux, you need to type in something complicated such as "apt-get install nautilus", "tar xvf gzip-1.2.4.tar", or both. If you don't know what those mean, or if you don't think you can memorize something like that, then YOU'RE PRETTY MUCH SCREWED. You don't want to be known as pretty much screwed, do you?
5. You are not a pompous ass
Common reasons for using OSX include things such as "I really like the interface", "My Mac came with a free iPod Nano" (students only), "I'm interested in Apple's iLife suite", or "It looked attractive on the shelf". Not all the best reasons, but at least decent reasons nonetheless. Common reasons for using Windows include "It's easier to get help because it's so widely used", "Most of the software I need or want is only for Windows", "It's very readily available", or "I really like the interface". Again, the reasons aren't necessarily the best, but they are still okay. Common reasons for using Linux include "It's free" (which doesn't make sense if you've already paid for an OS), "Windows is very buggy and unstable" (which is true, but most Linux distributions are even worse), and most commonly "It's not as popular, so if I use it then it makes me superior" (People won't admit to this reason, but it's true). None of these are good reasons. If you use Linux, it means YOU ARE JUST AS BAD AT BEING UNIQUE AS GOTHS, EMOS, and PUNKS WITH SPIKY GREEN AND PINK HAIR. You don't want to be as bad as those losers, do you?
In all reality, there are some valid reasons to use Linux, such as running large-scale web servers, or keeping tight corporate security. Unless you work for a large company, you probably don't have a good reason to be using Linux. Even if you build a computer yourself and simply don't want to give any money to Microsoft or Apple because you think that capitalism is evil, you should keep in mind that every single part you buy is made by a large company such as Intel, AMD, nVidia, or many others. Don't fall victim to the lies of the nerds, Being a sheep doesn't mean paying a large company for something that works; it means BLINDLY FOLLOWING THE NERDS AND SELF-PROCLAIMED EXPERTS JUST BECAUSE THEY TELL YOU TO. You don't want to be a sheep, do you?
1. You already PAID for an OS
Almost every new computer sold (with a few exceptions made by Dell) comes with either Mac OS X, Windows XP, or Windows Vista. When you purchased your computer, you PAID MONEY for the operating system that was bundled with it. Linux may be free, but why throw away what you already paid for? Furthermore, if you ever want to run Mac or Windows software on Linux, you have to PURCHASE MORE SOFTWARE to do so, rather than just running it natively on your pre-installed OS. It simply doesn't make economic sense, unless you are either a billionaire or bad at math. I'm pretty sure that I don't have any billionaire readers, so that means that ANYBODY WHO READS MY BLOG AND USES LINUX IS OPENLY ADMITTING TO HAVING FAILED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ARITHMETICS. You don't want to be known as a failure at elementary school, do you?
2. "Free alternatives" are just not as good
Because Linux won't actually run most commercial programs, many free programs have been made by Linux advocates as substitutes. Unfortunately, there are only three of these that are actually any good: Paint.net, OpenOffice.org, and Notepad ++, and two of the three don't even run on Linux! In addition, there is a lie being spread around that the GIMP is just as powerful as Photoshop and a good substitute; this may be true when comparing it to versions of Photoshop released in 1999 or earlier, but many of the most useful and important features introduced in Photoshop 6.0 and later still have yet to be replicated by the GIMP. This means that to accomplish anything useful in Linux other than word processing or spreadsheets, you have to use commercial, non-Linux software that won't necessarily even work when used with emulators or programs intended to do this, which very much defeats the purpose. TO DEFEAT SOMETHING AS KIND AND BEAUTIFUL AS THE PURPOSE IS VILLAINY, AND IF YOU DO THIS THAN KIM POSSIBLE WILL BUST INTO YOUR HOUSE AND BEAT THE CRAP OUT OF YOU. You don't want to be known as somebody who got beat up by a girl, do you?
3. It doesn't "just work"
When you buy a Mac, it comes pre-assembled with all compatible hardware and software. Most of it is made by the Apple and specifically designed to work well with what isn't made by Apple, so you can be sure it'll work right together. When you buy a PC, it comes pre-assembled with parts from all over the place that have been specifically selected by a manufacturer or retailer to make sure that they are compatible, so you can be sure it'll work right together. Linux, however, usually needs to be installed by the user, and there's no guarantee that a Linux driver will be available for whatever hardware you have. You'll likely spend long periods of time on community-based help sites such as ubuntuforums.org trying to solve a problem that would never have arisen on OSX or Windows. This means that ANYBODY WITH ANY AMOUNT OF EXPERIENCE WHO INSTALLS LINUX WILL TAKE LONGER INSTALLING A SIMPLE PRINTER THAN JOE AVERAGE WITH NEXT TO NO EXPERIENCE. You don't want to be known as slower than a noob, do you?
4. You are not a nerd
To install an application on a Mac, you drag the application's icon to where you want it to be, and you're done. To install an application on Windows, you run a step-by-step wizard that asks you where you want it to be, and sets up shortcuts for easy access. To install an application on Linux, you need to type in something complicated such as "apt-get install nautilus", "tar xvf gzip-1.2.4.tar", or both. If you don't know what those mean, or if you don't think you can memorize something like that, then YOU'RE PRETTY MUCH SCREWED. You don't want to be known as pretty much screwed, do you?
5. You are not a pompous ass
Common reasons for using OSX include things such as "I really like the interface", "My Mac came with a free iPod Nano" (students only), "I'm interested in Apple's iLife suite", or "It looked attractive on the shelf". Not all the best reasons, but at least decent reasons nonetheless. Common reasons for using Windows include "It's easier to get help because it's so widely used", "Most of the software I need or want is only for Windows", "It's very readily available", or "I really like the interface". Again, the reasons aren't necessarily the best, but they are still okay. Common reasons for using Linux include "It's free" (which doesn't make sense if you've already paid for an OS), "Windows is very buggy and unstable" (which is true, but most Linux distributions are even worse), and most commonly "It's not as popular, so if I use it then it makes me superior" (People won't admit to this reason, but it's true). None of these are good reasons. If you use Linux, it means YOU ARE JUST AS BAD AT BEING UNIQUE AS GOTHS, EMOS, and PUNKS WITH SPIKY GREEN AND PINK HAIR. You don't want to be as bad as those losers, do you?
In all reality, there are some valid reasons to use Linux, such as running large-scale web servers, or keeping tight corporate security. Unless you work for a large company, you probably don't have a good reason to be using Linux. Even if you build a computer yourself and simply don't want to give any money to Microsoft or Apple because you think that capitalism is evil, you should keep in mind that every single part you buy is made by a large company such as Intel, AMD, nVidia, or many others. Don't fall victim to the lies of the nerds, Being a sheep doesn't mean paying a large company for something that works; it means BLINDLY FOLLOWING THE NERDS AND SELF-PROCLAIMED EXPERTS JUST BECAUSE THEY TELL YOU TO. You don't want to be a sheep, do you?



27 Comments:
Woo-Hoo! Great Article!
There went 60 seconds of my life I will never get back....sigh
let see how much of your points have any value, shall we?
1) You already PAID for an OS
When you buy a white box pc, your OS is optional. But this is of-course a stupid argument, it makes no sense to use win XP, only because you paid for it. If my XP was a better OS than Ubuntu, i would be using it, of-course, it isn't.
2) "Free alternatives" are just not as good
Maybe you forget some "free alternatives?" Lets see, Apache is free, Java is, Amarok kicks ass, XaraLX is not bad, Scribus does a decent job, Firefox is completely open source, Thunderbird would be eating outlook-express for lunch if Evolution did already had it for breakfast, VLC does not tell me that watching a dvd is illegal, ... do i have to go on?
3) It doesn't "just work"
It does, when i put the ubuntu cd in my pc, it just works, even without installing it on my harddisk. Eat that VISTA! Installing a printer? Why? mine works as soon as I put the usb cable in. Oh, you mean you did not buy linux compatible hardware? Ttt, please don't tell me you couldn't find any (Intel, HP, Dell, Nvidia, AMD, ATI, all support linux)
4) You are not a nerd
I would delete this one, just to be sure nobody thinks you are a stupid troll. If you would have spend a half hour longer playing with linux, you would have known that all you have to do to install a program in linux, is clicking twice with your mouse, and entering your password. (So your PC knows it is you who want to do the install, and not some kind of virus.) You don't believe me? RTFM
5) You are not a pompous ass
Obviously, you don't need to use Linux to be a pompous ass. All it takes to be a pompous ass these days, is writing a blog about Linux, without spending the time to actually getting to know the OS. You didn't even understand that when Linux users talk about free-software, they are talking about "free as in speech"-software, and not about "free as in beer".
And that, my dear Pompous Ass, is rather elementary!
Now if you buy a Dell or System76 computer with Ubuntu already on it, then two of these don't even apply. Anyway, on to the debunking!
1) So you paid for it. And? You're not throwing away money, you already threw the money away. If you buy a movie and it sucks, to you watch it every day because you don't want to waste money? No, you go watch something else. And no, you don't have to purchase additional software to run Mac or Windows on Linux. VMware is free. Xen is free. Or you can just dual-boot, which is also free. Who failed elementary school again?
2) Amarok, VLC, Firefox, OpenOffice, Pidgin, Evolution, Thunderbird... No, GIMP is not as good as Photoshop. But it's FREE. How many home users actually purchase Photoshop? Not many. I'm betting the version you're using is pirated. =P And.... Kim Possible...? How old are you? :|
3) You're right, it doesn't always just work. Only about 85% of the time it works right off the bat, and about 99% of the time it works with a little tinkering. Buy a computer with Linux preinstalled, or have a friend do it for you. Done and done. :O
4) Have you ever used Ubuntu's Add/Remove feature? It lists all the programs by category, and to install it, you check a box and click OK. Easy. Easier than Windows, even. My cousin's a n00b and he figured it out in a few seconds.
5) It's simple. It's free. It's got a nice interface. (Have you seen Beryl or Compiz?) It's easy. (Once it's installed, it's pretty dead simple.) It's easy to get help. (Ubuntuforums.org has over 300,000 users, and you'll usually get a reply within the hour. I have yet to find support for windows as good as that.) It's readily available... of course. Oh, and no anti-virus or firewall software needed. (Additional software you would have to PAY for if you use Windows.)
Do a little research, buddy. And maybe try acting a little older. Unless you enjoy elementary school insults...
How to tell this post was a joke:
1. Photoshop + Acrobat + Microsoft Office = $1450
2. Paint.net and notepad++ are not good reasons to run Windows.
3. The writer claims to be unable to install a printer. Hello, people? Are you seriously going to take advice from someone who can't install a printer?
4. You can't play a music cd on a computer running windows without having a rootkit installed. Nevermind the nice wizards that step you through installing viruses and other malware.
5. The writer claims people use Windows because "I really like the interface"
Ding Ding Ding! Clearly commenter no.4 has read How to Get Things (for Digg and YouTube users)!
it means BLINDLY FOLLOWING THE NERDS AND SELF-PROCLAIMED EXPERTS JUST BECAUSE THEY TELL YOU TO. You don't want to be a sheep, do you?
Yes, also don't install linux because a pompous nerd and self -proclaimed expert tells you not to. You don't want to be a sheep, do you?
You can try linux,find out and decide by yourself.
I know I did. And it worked for me.
Hi,
Paint.Net is portable to Linux via Mono project.
comeon vista and hardware don't match how somebody told up the page some operative computer costs more the 6000 dollars now for vista the hardware cost just alone more the 2000 dollars if you wanna run the new directX 10 pardon 3000 dollars just the hardware and you can have a descent #D effects in windows vista in my computer poor old i can have most the 3D effects in 64 mb video ram running vista ?forget it yeah the only problem has linux it's the app interface the are some very ugly but it's suppose for business hoo really if you sell lies you must have a nice face and white smile well the only i can not make it's play games it's the only i can say i miss about property software I'm a simple desktop user, and decide to use PCLINUXOS and it's work most of what i do with my computer like a user and can say about your % points it's just bull shit
WOW!!!! You're an absolute idiot!!!! Does someone really pay you to write this crap??!!
all This show how idiot you are.
Ho told you when i/we buy a computer it always coma with an OS ? Can't anyone simple buy a custmized computer?
linux is not for nerd's
as a matter of fact, somebody whos got something grey inside the head prefers to have a high performance operating sistem, and don't need to care about virus, spywares, all kinds of worms
and some companys, as you've mentioned send the cds on you home, like ubuntu for instance, you just request and they send world wide (i am brazilian and received my cd here)while micro$oft ask to much for a poor sistem like Vista.
Hmm lets see:
1) 1. You already PAID for an OS
Almost every one I know has only every bought one pc from a store, thereby getting a pre-installed os. After that it's a gradual process of hardware upgrades with maybe a motherboard/processor change every few years. Incase you haven't noticed, Windows upgrades are not free. Taking a windows using friend as an example:
Computer came with Win 95, £80 to upgrade to 98, £80 upgrade to ME, £80 upgrade to XP....
Last os I paid for was Win98 and I haven't looked back
2) I've been using Linux a few years now and haven't found one thing that I could do on Windows that I can't do just as easily on Linux. Gaming, I think all Linux users will agree, is the exceMYption but hey, a subscription to Cedega is cheaper than a subscription to most anti-virus sofware. Oh, and all that great software is of course free. ANYBODY WHO READS YOUR BLOG AND USES WINDOWS IS OPENLY ADMITTING TO HAVING FAILED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ARITHMETICS.
3) It's always just worked for me. Last install of Linux I did took all of 30 mins and that was including all hardware fully configured. Last time I installed XP for anyone it took an entire afternoon, including time to get the drivers for the hardware, restarting virtually after each one, and that was just to get a base system with no useable software. On linux I could also use the pc while the os was installing thanks to Live CD's
4) Most Linux flavours come with a package manager. Installing software is as easy as clicking the great big "Install Software" icon then your presented with a great choice of packages without even to search the net
5) Wouldn't shouting in your blog using caps to try and hammer home your points count as being a pompous ass? You'll find a lot of Windows users are to pompous to try Linus, thinking they already have the best system. I use Linux because I get more out my pc than I ever did using Windows, I can get up to date software I couldn't afford on Windows (Photoshop + Acrobat + Microsoft Office = $1450 as someone already said), I don't need to constantly worry about spyware, drive-by trojan downloads, key-loggers, etc. I can just get on with using my pc
Horrible post, try to do some research before writing this gibberish next time. Also, excessive use of capslock makes you look silly.
Why is it that the most ignorant people cry the loudest?
I've been using OpenSuse (I know it's a distro for windows kiddies) since february this year, but after importing all my email from thunderbird to Kmail (linux thunderbird also available) .. everythings been fine.
The installation of suse took a while, but once it's in, everything works fine out of the box (with the exception of wireless network drivers)
It's only when you start tinkering that you need to know anything.
I don't know about everyone, but my parents only use their athlon PC for web browsing, checking emails & downloading their photos from their digital cameras & occasional photo resizing.
Suse (and also (K)Ubuntu) does this out of the box.
And Open Office is installed by default.. and I don't even have to install a pirated copy of a $600 suite to get this functionality.
Updates are installed "On the fly" with no nasty pop-up nag screens telling you that the computer needs to reboot.
Vista is even worse. You can't play games with the bundled video drivers. You can't play commercial DVD's with the updated video drivers you download from the manufacturer (DVD Backups & Divx files work fine :p ).
And Dell are now offering PC's with linux pre-installed - hopefully less costs associated with the M$ OS.
Enough said.
This article is just a poorly scripted, poorly researched article written by a poor excuse for an "I.T. Professional".
The old adage stands.
Professionals are people that make easy things look difficult.
Experts are people that make difficult things look easy.
Here,here you little troll.
This is a big plate of food for your thought.VISTA.Have a BIG lunch.
It is so obvious that you do not know the first thing you are talking about with linux.
For all you windows users out there who are reading this blog,if you are reading this because you are looking into linux,find a reliable source of info.It isn't found here.
Eh. I paid a grand total of $11 bucks for my linux distro (that is if you take the price of the computing magazine out of what I paid for it).
My printer was found straight away and installed by linux. To date,it refuses to work under windows.
My iPOD (for windows) works just as well under linux without having to install any additional software
I got the open office suite. My Windows XP came with a grand total of Wordpad
I can actually customize my desktop without shelling out for some silly theming program. Pretty sweet if you ask me. Plus I dual-boot so I am not "throwing out" my windows OS
You guys, this post was a joke! the excessive use of Caps Lock was intended to make me look silly. The lack of research was deliberate. Please learn what sarcasm is before making rampant accusations.
How old is the author? 11? No wait, we're he 11, he'd have a clue and use Linux.
Covarr: It read more as a desperate cry for attention rather than a joke. As a joke, not very funny.
I enjoyed reading the article. Linux is rubbish, I must be a very silly boy for using it. Microsoft is the best, It's never crashed on me, runs really fast and I don't have to reinstall every few weeks.
I think that the vista windows sidebar thing is very original and that anyone who copies it is scum for violating ms ip, even if they claim to have done so about 6 years ago.
I also want to spend my money on software that doesn't break my pc or stops other software that I have installed or paid for from working.
My lawyer says that if I carry on using linux that I will go to jail, but if I get stoned, drunk and drive the wrong way down a motorway that as long as I pay ms then I will be let off.
I am a noob because I use linux. If I could use my pc properly I'd be using vista and the FBI/ script kiddies could help me taking control of my pc and using it to make sure I had no impure thoughts and that I spread my share of viri and spam. After all it would be such a waste of available bandwidth not to use it all.
Kind regards,
e2 (linux user)
check this out !! my wife, ( she is brazilian ) knew only windows until i showed her pc linux and all the options that come with kde, free software, etc etc.she works as a systems analyst for a hotel chain that was constantly having fits with sql server and oracle. she convinced her boss to port everything over to mysql, and wham bam, thank you ma'am, her work productivity increased almost doubled. oh yeah, my wife is not a geek, i guess that's an afterthought.
Linux is a great OS and is improving constantly. Because you do not have the desire to modify your OS does not mean it is not for home users.
Use the OS of your choice.
It's a pity that you couldn't have researched your topic of interest. Your entry is nothing more than a disproportinal, biased, poor, stereotypical writing with no actual claims against anything you've written.
I'm fortunate enough to use Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux, Mac OS X and Sun Microsystems Solaris 10, and having used each of these thoroughly, I can vouch for the fact that no Operating System is perfect, however your claims against GNU/Linux are poor and absolutely false on every count.
1. Microsoft forces its Operating System onto OEMs and threatens them if said OEMs refuse to distribute it. It is illegal. GNU/Linux is a choice. Not a requirement. Also, you have a legal entitlement to refuse Microsoft's software. If you had read the inclusive EULA, you would have known that.
2. Are you saying that Mozilla Firefox isn't better than Internet Explorer? Are you saying that OpenOffice.Org isn't as good as Microsoft Office System 2007? Are you saying that The GIMP is inadequate? The fact is that people don't want to have to re-learn how to use software. Internet Explorer and Microsoft Office System 2007 are just two examples of the fact that people will have to waste time, energy, money and resources re-learning how to use the software and thus reducing productivity. Microsoft is poor at consistency.
3. Yes it does. Sabayon GNU/Linux does. Ubuntu GNU/Linux does. LinuxMint GNU/Linux does. openSUSE GNU/Linux does. Microsoft Windows Vista doesn't. Microsoft Windows XP doesn't. Also in the case of connecting a printer, I connected my Epson 320 Photo printer to my openSUSE Desktop PC, it was detected, I supplied my root password and openSUSE installed the device and configured it correctly within two minutes. It is not difficult. Stop lying.
4. Your claim about Linux suffering from software errors is written in the wrong context. The fact that software problems are highlighted and resolved within a number of days is a strength, not a weakness, and it is why Open Source software is strong. Microsoft certainly wouldn't do so with Microsoft Windows and it only serves to their disadvantage. Also, learn to count.
I apologize for my earlier comment. I thought you were actually serious. :P
"You guys, this post was a joke! the excessive use of Caps Lock was intended to make me look silly. The lack of research was deliberate. Please learn what sarcasm is before making rampant accusations."
Given the amount and quality of FUD from well-known FUD factories, I'd say this article is rather subtle irony than sarcasm.
What a wast of my time, and what Majorleague bigtime bullshitstory.
Wow. Did you ever hit a nerve! Gotta be careful with those topics. On the flip side, did your hits go through the roof?
:)
Owl.
I love how touchy these Linux nerds get when you talk about their beloved product xD I have nothing against Linux ad think it's pretty neat, but my respect for Linux users has dropped considerably, now that I see that not a lone of them has a sense of humor.
Guys, check out the entry "joke" in the dictionary xD
Post a Comment
<< Home